Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible

Joint Authors

Hu, Fengling
Gong, Yiming
Bian, Zhen
Zhang, Xiaoying
Xu, Bin
Zhang, Jianguo
Shi, Xiaojun
Yu, Youcheng
Song, Liang

Source

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-10, 10 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-04-08

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

10

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with magnetic attachments can provide an effective treatment modality for edentulous patients.

In this study, a three-dimensional finite element analysis was used to compare the biomechanical characteristics of three different types of magnetic attachments in two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.

Flat-type, dome-type, and cushion-type of the magnetic attachments were designed to retain the overdenture.

Four types of load were applied to the overdenture in each model: 100 N vertical and oblique loads on the right first molar and a 100 N vertical load on the right canine and the lower incisors.

The biomechanical behaviors of peri-implant bone, abutment, and mucosa were recorded.

In vertical incisors, vertical right canine, and oblique molar loading condition, the flat-type group exhibited the highest levels of maximum equivalent strain/stress in the peri-implant bone.

The total deformation of mucosa and the maximum equivalent strain/stress in the oblique molar loading condition are about two times as the vertical molar loading condition.

These results suggested that both cushion-type and dome-type of the magnetic attachments are better choices in two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures, and oblique loading is more harmful than vertical loading.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Hu, Fengling& Gong, Yiming& Bian, Zhen& Zhang, Xiaoying& Xu, Bin& Zhang, Jianguo…[et al.]. 2019. Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1130656

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Hu, Fengling…[et al.]. Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1130656

American Medical Association (AMA)

Hu, Fengling& Gong, Yiming& Bian, Zhen& Zhang, Xiaoying& Xu, Bin& Zhang, Jianguo…[et al.]. Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1130656

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1130656