A Simulation Study Comparing Different Statistical Approaches for the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers

Joint Authors

Haller, Bernhard
Ulm, Kurt
Hapfelmeier, Alexander

Source

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-15, 15 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-06-13

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

15

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Identification of relevant biomarkers that are associated with a treatment effect is one requirement for adequate treatment stratification and consequently to improve health care by administering the best available treatment to an individual patient.

Various statistical approaches were proposed that allow assessing the interaction between a continuous covariate and treatment.

Nevertheless, categorization of a continuous covariate, e.g., by splitting the data at the observed median value, appears to be very prevalent in practice.

In this article, we present a simulation study considering data as observed in a randomized clinical trial with a time-to-event outcome performed to compare properties of such approaches, namely, Cox regression with linear interaction, Multivariable Fractional Polynomials for Interaction (MFPI), Local Partial-Likelihood Bootstrap (LPLB), and the Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) method, and of strategies based on categorization of continuous covariates (splitting the covariate at the median, splitting at quartiles, and using an “optimal” split by maximizing a corresponding test statistic).

In different scenarios with no interactions, linear interactions or nonlinear interactions, type I error probability and the power for detection of a true covariate-treatment interaction were estimated.

The Cox regression approach was more efficient than the other methods for scenarios with monotonous interactions, especially when the number of observed events was small to moderate.

When patterns of the biomarker-treatment interaction effect were more complex, MFPI and LPLB performed well compared to the other approaches.

Categorization of data generally led to a loss of power, but for very complex patterns, splitting the data into multiple categories might help to explore the nature of the interaction effect.

Consequently, we recommend application of statistical methods developed for assessment of interactions between continuous biomarkers and treatment instead of arbitrary or data-driven categorization of continuous covariates.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Haller, Bernhard& Ulm, Kurt& Hapfelmeier, Alexander. 2019. A Simulation Study Comparing Different Statistical Approaches for the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-15.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1130669

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Haller, Bernhard…[et al.]. A Simulation Study Comparing Different Statistical Approaches for the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-15.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1130669

American Medical Association (AMA)

Haller, Bernhard& Ulm, Kurt& Hapfelmeier, Alexander. A Simulation Study Comparing Different Statistical Approaches for the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-15.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1130669

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1130669