Effect of Missing Data Imputation on Deep Learning Prediction Performance for Vesicoureteral Reflux and Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Clinical Study

Abstract EN

Missing observations are always a challenging problem that we have to deal with in diseases that require follow-up.

In hospital records for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI), the number of complete cases is very low on demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, and imaging data.

On the other hand, deep learning (DL) approaches can be used for highly missing observation scenarios with its own missing ratio algorithm.

In this study, the effects of multiple imputation techniques MICE and FAMD on the performance of DL in the differential diagnosis were compared.

The data of a retrospective cross-sectional study including 611 pediatric patients were evaluated (425 with VUR, 186 with rUTI, 26.65% missing ratio) in this research.

CNTK and R 3.6.3 have been used for evaluating different models for 34 features (physical, laboratory, and imaging findings).

In the differential diagnosis of VUR and rUTI, the best performance was obtained by deep learning with MICE algorithm with its values, respectively, 64.05% accuracy, 64.59% sensitivity, and 62.62% specificity.

FAMD algorithm performed with accuracy=61.52, sensitivity=60.20, and specificity was found out to be 61.00 with 3 principal components on missing imputation phase.

DL-based approaches can evaluate datasets without doing preomit/impute missing values from datasets.

Once DL method is used together with appropriate missing imputation techniques, it shows higher predictive performance.