Strongyloidiasis in Africa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Prevalence, Diagnostic Methods, and Study Settings

Joint Authors

Hailu, Tadesse
Nibret, Endalkachew
Amor, Arancha
Munshea, Abaineh

Source

BioMed Research International

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-12, 12 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-11-16

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

12

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Background.

Strongyloidiasis is an intestinal parasitic infection mainly caused by Strongyloides stercoralis.

Although it is a predominant parasite in tropics and subtropics where sanitation and hygiene are poorly practiced, the true prevalence of strongyloidiasis is not known due to low-sensitivity diagnostic methods.

Objective.

This systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed at determining the pooled prevalence of strongyloidiasis in African countries, stratified by diagnostic methods, study settings, and patients.

Methods.

Cross-sectional studies on strongyloidiasis published in African countries from the year 2008 up to 2018 in PubMed and Google Scholar databases and which reported at least one Strongyloides spp.

infection were included.

Identification and screening of eligible articles were also done.

Articles whose focus was on strongyloidiasis in animals, soil, and foreigners infected by Strongyloides spp.

in Africa were excluded.

The random effects model was used to calculate the pooled prevalence of strongyloidiasis across African countries as well as by diagnostic methods and study settings.

The heterogeneity between studies was also computed.

Result.

A total of 82 studies were included.

The overall pooled prevalence of strongyloidiasis was 2.7%.

By individual techniques, the pooled prevalence of strongyloidiasis was 0.4%, 1.0%, 3.4%, 9.3%, 9.6%, and 19.4% by the respective direct saline microscopy, Kato-Katz, formol ether concentration, polymerase chain reaction, Baermann concentration, and culture diagnostic techniques.

The prevalence rates of strongyloidiasis among rural community, school, and health institution studies were 6.8%, 6.4%, and 0.9%, respectively.

The variation on the effect size comparing African countries, diagnostic methods, study settings, and patients was significant (P≤0.001).

Conclusions.

This review shows that strongyloidiasis is overlooked and its prevalence is estimated to be low in Africa due to the use of diagnostic methods with low sensitivity.

Therefore, there is a need for using a combination of appropriate diagnostic methods to approach the actual strongyloidiasis rates in Africa.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Hailu, Tadesse& Nibret, Endalkachew& Amor, Arancha& Munshea, Abaineh. 2020. Strongyloidiasis in Africa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Prevalence, Diagnostic Methods, and Study Settings. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-12.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1132779

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Hailu, Tadesse…[et al.]. Strongyloidiasis in Africa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Prevalence, Diagnostic Methods, and Study Settings. BioMed Research International No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-12.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1132779

American Medical Association (AMA)

Hailu, Tadesse& Nibret, Endalkachew& Amor, Arancha& Munshea, Abaineh. Strongyloidiasis in Africa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Prevalence, Diagnostic Methods, and Study Settings. BioMed Research International. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-12.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1132779

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1132779