The Assessment of the Reduction Algorithm in the Treatment for “Logsplitter” Injury

Joint Authors

Shou, Kangquan
Yang, Huarui
Yang, Yi
Bao, Tongzhu
Adhikary, Richa
Zou, Liang
Yao, Hao
Adhikary, Krishna

Source

BioMed Research International

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-8, 8 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-03-10

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

8

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

As a rare and exceptional injury with significant syndesmotic disruption, the outcome of Logsplitter injury remains poor and unfavorable.

In this study, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between the intraoperative reduction quality and the prognosis such as the posttraumatic osteoarthritis to help surgeons achieve better functional outcomes for this high-energy transsyndesmotic ankle fracture dislocation.

From January 2015 to February 2019, 31 patients (average 37.6±9.4 years with 19 male and 12 female) diagnosed with the Logsplitter injury were treated by ORIF procedure and enrolled in our study.

Particularly, nine vital radiographic parameters including medial clear space, talocrural angle, superior clear space, tibiofibular clear space, tibiofibular overlap, talar tilt, coin sign, tibial medial malleolus angle, and fibular lateral malleolus angle were measured from a postoperative film (AP and mortise view).

Next, we compared the clinical outcome by using range of ankle motion, AOFAS scores, Burwell-Charnley score system, and Kellergen-Lawrence criteria from the patients who obtained the intraoperative anatomical reduction with those who failed.

Our results showed that AOFAS score with all the patients was 79.33±5.82 at the final follow-up.

14 (45.1%) of 31 patients were observed with radiographic posttraumatic arthritis of the ankle joint with an average Kellgren-Lawrence score of 1.75±1.6 at final follow-up.

Most importantly, our results proved that there were significant differences between the patients eligible for anatomical reduction quality with those who failed with regard to OA rate (33.3% vs.

85.7%, P=0.003) and AOFAS scores (75.33±6.53 vs.

66.89±4.28, P=0.037) at the final follow-up.

Furthermore, the functional outcome after the operation showed an increased range of motion of the ankle joint of the patients obtained anatomical reduction compared with those who failed (P<0.05).

In this study, the significant discrepancy with regard to the functional outcomes was observed between the acceptable and unacceptable radiographic parameters, indicating that the quality of intraoperative reduction is scientifically significant and thus can be utilized as the major factor to predict the clinical outcomes for Logsplitter injuries.

Moreover, this reduction algorithm arising from our study can also be applied to other ankle fractures and dislocation involving syndesmotic complex.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Shou, Kangquan& Adhikary, Richa& Zou, Liang& Yao, Hao& Yang, Huarui& Adhikary, Krishna…[et al.]. 2020. The Assessment of the Reduction Algorithm in the Treatment for “Logsplitter” Injury. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1133717

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Shou, Kangquan…[et al.]. The Assessment of the Reduction Algorithm in the Treatment for “Logsplitter” Injury. BioMed Research International No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1133717

American Medical Association (AMA)

Shou, Kangquan& Adhikary, Richa& Zou, Liang& Yao, Hao& Yang, Huarui& Adhikary, Krishna…[et al.]. The Assessment of the Reduction Algorithm in the Treatment for “Logsplitter” Injury. BioMed Research International. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1133717

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1133717