The Efficacy and Safety of PD-1PD-L1 Inhibitors in Combination with Conventional Therapies for Advanced Solid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract EN

Objectives.

To evaluate the efficacy of immuno-oncology combinational therapy (IOCT) versus monotherapy with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors or conventional therapies, i.e., non-IOCT, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods.

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from January 2015 to October 2018 for eligible studies.

We included randomized trials of IOCT with available hazard ratios (HR) for death.

The random effects model was used to calculate pooled HR for death; heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics.

The main outcome measure was overall survival (OS).

Results.

After screening 483 relevant articles, we identified twelve trials comprising 5388 patients for quantitative analysis.

IOCT-treated patients had significantly higher tumor response rate (relative risk (RR): 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82-3.47), prolonged progression-free survival (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.53-0.74), and OS (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0.78), compared with non-IOCT–treated patients.

Sensitivity analyses also demonstrated the OS advantage of IOCT across different combination modalities, intervention agents, malignancy types, and PD-L1 expression (all P<0.05).

Notably, there were higher odds of high-grade (grade≥3) adverse events with IOCT (RR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.13-2.90), but the risk of treatment-related death (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.84–1.60) was not increased compared with non-IOCT.

Conclusions.

IOCT is a preferable treatment option over PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy and conventional therapy for patients with advanced solid tumors.

However, we should note the increased incidence rate of high-grade AEs in IOCT.