Characterizing Hotspots and Frontier Landscapes of Diabetes-Specific Distress from 2000 to 2018: A Bibliometric Study

Abstract EN

Objectives.

This work aims to comprehensively characterize hotspots and frontier landscapes concerning diabetes-specific distress from 2000 to 2018.

Materials and Methods.

Firstly, diabetes-specific distress-related literature was retrieved and downloaded from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC).

Secondly, WoSCC self-contained toolkits and GraphPad Prism7 were conducted to analyze general characteristics, including literature products, countries, institutes, authors, and journal resource.

Finally, CiteSpace V Toolkits was put forward to implement advanced analysis, consisting of keyword-term frequency and co-occurrence, references-cited frequency and co-occurrence, and burst detection for keyword terms and references cited, which uncovers the hotspots and frontiers of diabetes-specific distress.

Results.

After preprocessing, our study included a total of 1051 papers concerning diabetes-specific distress.

Publication outputs increased smoothly year by year.

Compared with other journals, diabetic medicine delivered the largest number of documents.

The United States occupied the leading positions, and the most productive institution was the University of California System in terms of literature products.

Fisher L.

has the highest references-cited frequency.

Prevalence of diabetes-specific distress, diabetes-specific distress and glycemic control, diabetes-specific distress and depression comorbidity, and diabetes-specific distress and risk factors were the research hotspots, whereas the measure of diabetes-specific distress and latent and serious/severe diabetes-specific distress was the research frontiers.

Conclusions.

Overall, our study may inspire researchers to show great interest in diabetes-specific distress in the next few years.