Comment on “Modified Weights-of-Evidence Modeling with Example of Missing Geochemical Data”
Author
Source
Issue
Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-4, 4 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2020-07-22
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
4
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Even when restricted to a particular method, the undertaking by Zhang and Agterberg [1] seems surprising to review a topic as complex as estimating probabilities [2–5] without a single mathematical definition or formula.
Thus, it becomes almost inevitable that this review provokes comments for reasons of mathematical clarification, in particular by this author because he has fragmentarily been referred to at several instances.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Schaeben, Helmut. 2020. Comment on “Modified Weights-of-Evidence Modeling with Example of Missing Geochemical Data”. Complexity،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-4.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1143583
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Schaeben, Helmut. Comment on “Modified Weights-of-Evidence Modeling with Example of Missing Geochemical Data”. Complexity No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-4.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1143583
American Medical Association (AMA)
Schaeben, Helmut. Comment on “Modified Weights-of-Evidence Modeling with Example of Missing Geochemical Data”. Complexity. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-4.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1143583
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-1143583
