Comment on “Tapered Cuff versus Conventional Cuff for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Ventilated Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”
Joint Authors
Source
Issue
Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-2, 2 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2019-07-07
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
2
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Despite progress in the field of infection prevention, avoiding ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains challenging.
In this regard, we read with great interest the recently published paper by Huang et al.
and would like to compliment the authors on this interesting meta-analysis [1].
American Psychological Association (APA)
Maertens, Bert& Blot, Stijn. 2019. Comment on “Tapered Cuff versus Conventional Cuff for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Ventilated Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”. Canadian Respiratory Journal،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1145692
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Maertens, Bert& Blot, Stijn. Comment on “Tapered Cuff versus Conventional Cuff for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Ventilated Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”. Canadian Respiratory Journal No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1145692
American Medical Association (AMA)
Maertens, Bert& Blot, Stijn. Comment on “Tapered Cuff versus Conventional Cuff for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Ventilated Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”. Canadian Respiratory Journal. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1145692
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-1145692
