Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial

Joint Authors

Ładny, J. R.
Szarpak, Lukasz
Smereka, Jacek
Bialka, Szymon
Katipoğlu, Burak
Evrin, Togay
Gorczyca, Damian

Source

Emergency Medicine International

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-7, 7 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-08-20

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

7

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Introduction.

Airway management is one of key elements of resuscitation.

Endotracheal intubation is still considered the gold standard for airway management during resuscitation.

Aim.

The aim of the study was to compare success rates and intubation time of different endotracheal intubation methods during emergency intubation with difficult airways in the conditions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a standardized manikin model.

Methods.

The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study.

It involved 46 paramedics with at least 5 years of experience in Emergency Medical Service.

The participants performed endotracheal intubation under difficult airway conditions during continuous chest compression, implemented with the LUCAS3 chest compression system.

Three methods of tracheal intubation were applied: (1) standard Macintosh laryngoscope without a bougie stylet; (2) standard laryngoscope and a standard bougie stylet; (3) standard laryngoscope and a new bougie stylet.

Results.

The overall intubation success rate was 100% in the standard bougie and new bougie groups and lower (86.9%) when no bougie stylet was used (P=0.028).

The intubation success rate with the 1st attempt equalled 91.3% for the new bougie group, 73.9% for standard bougie, and only 23.9% in the no-bougie group.

The median intubation time was shortest in the new bougie group, where it amounted to 29 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 25–38); the time equalled 38s (IQR:31–44.5) in the standard bougie group and 47.5s (IQR:36–58) in the no-bougie group.

The ease of use was lowest in the no-bougie group (85, IQR:63–88), average in the standard bougie group (44, IQR:30–51), and highest in the new bougie stylet group (32, IQR:19–41).

Conclusion.

In this manikin-based study, paramedics were able to perform endotracheal intubation with higher efficacy and in a shorter time using the new bougie stylet as compared with the standard bougie stylet.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Evrin, Togay& Smereka, Jacek& Gorczyca, Damian& Bialka, Szymon& Ładny, J. R.& Katipoğlu, Burak…[et al.]. 2019. Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial. Emergency Medicine International،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1152284

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Evrin, Togay…[et al.]. Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial. Emergency Medicine International No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1152284

American Medical Association (AMA)

Evrin, Togay& Smereka, Jacek& Gorczyca, Damian& Bialka, Szymon& Ładny, J. R.& Katipoğlu, Burak…[et al.]. Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial. Emergency Medicine International. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1152284

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1152284