Defining New Research Questions and Protocols in the Field of Traumatic Brain Injury through Public Engagement: Preliminary Results and Review of the Literature

Joint Authors

Ganau, M.
Hasan, Shumaila
Chari, Aswin
Uff, Chris

Source

Emergency Medicine International

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-8, 8 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-10-31

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

8

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the most common cause of death and disability in the age group below 40 years.

The financial cost of loss of earnings and medical care presents a massive burden to family, society, social care, and healthcare, the cost of which is estimated at £1 billion per annum (about brain injury (online)).

At present, we still lack a full understanding on the pathophysiology of TBI, and biomarkers represent the next frontier of breakthrough discoveries.

Unfortunately, many tenets limit their widespread adoption.

Brain tissue sampling is the mainstay of diagnosis in neuro-oncology; following on this path, we hypothesise that information gleaned from neural tissue samples obtained in TBI patients upon hospital admission may correlate with outcome data in TBI patients, enabling an early, accurate, and more comprehensive pathological classification, with the intent of guiding treatment and future research.

We proposed various methods of tissue sampling at opportunistic times: two methods rely on a dedicated sample being taken; the remainder relies on tissue that would otherwise be discarded.

To gauge acceptance of this, and as per the guidelines set out by the National Research Ethics Service, we conducted a survey of TBI and non-TBI patients admitted to our Trauma ward and their families.

100 responses were collected between December 2017 and July 2018, incorporating two redesigns in response to patient feedback.

75.0% of respondents said that they would consent to a brain biopsy performed at the time of insertion of an intracranial pressure (ICP) bolt.

7.0% replied negatively and 18.0% did not know.

70.0% would consent to insertion of a jugular bulb catheter to obtain paired intracranial venous samples and peripheral samples for analysis of biomarkers.

Over 94.0% would consent to neural tissue from ICP probes, external ventricular drains (EVD), and lumbar drains (LD) to be salvaged, and 95.0% would consent to intraoperative samples for further analysis.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Hasan, Shumaila& Chari, Aswin& Ganau, M.& Uff, Chris. 2019. Defining New Research Questions and Protocols in the Field of Traumatic Brain Injury through Public Engagement: Preliminary Results and Review of the Literature. Emergency Medicine International،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1152325

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Hasan, Shumaila…[et al.]. Defining New Research Questions and Protocols in the Field of Traumatic Brain Injury through Public Engagement: Preliminary Results and Review of the Literature. Emergency Medicine International No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1152325

American Medical Association (AMA)

Hasan, Shumaila& Chari, Aswin& Ganau, M.& Uff, Chris. Defining New Research Questions and Protocols in the Field of Traumatic Brain Injury through Public Engagement: Preliminary Results and Review of the Literature. Emergency Medicine International. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1152325

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1152325