In Search of TGCT Biomarkers: A Comprehensive In Silico and Histopathological Analysis

Joint Authors

Raos, Dora
Krasic, Jure
Masic, Silvija
Abramovic, Irena
Coric, Marijana
Kruslin, Bozo
Katusic Bojanac, Ana
Bulic-Jakus, Floriana
Jezek, Davor
Ulamec, Monika
Sincic, Nino

Source

Disease Markers

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-18, 18 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-11-06

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

18

Main Subjects

Diseases

Abstract EN

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are ever more affecting the young male population.

Germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) is the origin of TGCTs, namely, seminomas (SE) and a heterogeneous group of nonseminomas (NS) comprising embryonal carcinoma, teratoma, yolk sac tumor, and choriocarcinoma.

Response to the treatment and prognosis, especially of NS, depend on precise diagnosis with a necessity for discovery of new biomarkers.

We aimed to perform comprehensive in silico analysis at the DNA, RNA, and protein levels of six prospective (HOXA9, MGMT, CFC1, PRSS21, RASSF1A, and MAGEC2) and six known TGCT biomarkers (OCT4, SOX17, SOX2, SALL4, NANOG, and KIT) and assess its congruence with histopathological analysis in all forms of TGCTs.

Cancer Hallmarks Analytics Tool, the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins database, and UALCAN, an interactive web resource for analyzing cancer OMICS data, were used.

In 108 TGCT and 48 tumor-free testicular samples, the immunoreactivity score (IRS) was calculated.

SE showed higher frequency in DNA alteration, while DNA methylation was significantly higher for all prospective biomarkers in NS.

In GCNIS, we assessed the clinical positivity of RASSF1 and PRSS21 in 52% and 62% of samples, respectively, in contrast to low or nil positivity in healthy seminiferous tubules, TGTCs as a group, SE, NS, or all NS components.

Although present in approximately 80% of healthy seminiferous tubules (HT) and GCNIS, HOXA9 was diagnostically positive in 64% of TGCTs, while it was positive in 82% of NS versus 29% of SE.

Results at the DNA, mRNA, and protein levels on putative and already known biomarkers were included in the suggested panels that may prove to be important for better diagnostics of various forms of TGCTs.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Raos, Dora& Krasic, Jure& Masic, Silvija& Abramovic, Irena& Coric, Marijana& Kruslin, Bozo…[et al.]. 2020. In Search of TGCT Biomarkers: A Comprehensive In Silico and Histopathological Analysis. Disease Markers،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1154105

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Raos, Dora…[et al.]. In Search of TGCT Biomarkers: A Comprehensive In Silico and Histopathological Analysis. Disease Markers No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1154105

American Medical Association (AMA)

Raos, Dora& Krasic, Jure& Masic, Silvija& Abramovic, Irena& Coric, Marijana& Kruslin, Bozo…[et al.]. In Search of TGCT Biomarkers: A Comprehensive In Silico and Histopathological Analysis. Disease Markers. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1154105

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1154105