Publications in Integrative and Complementary Medicine: A Ten-Year Bibliometric Survey in the Field of ICM

Abstract EN

Background.

This article aims to analyze the research status of integrative complementary medicine (ICM) and features of highly cited papers in the field to provide reference of the future development of ICM.

Methods.

Publications in the field of ICM from 2009 to 2018 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection.

The top 20 countries/territories, institutions, journals, keywords of highly cited and noncited papers, and characteristics of essential science indicator (ESI) papers, as well as open access (OA) and non-OA papers, were analyzed.

Results.

Mainland China had the largest number of ICM publications.

The top 20 journals published a total of 31667 papers in 2009–2018, which represented 92.9% of all publications.

Keywords of highly cited and noncited papers point to different research directions.

48 ESI highly cited/hot papers were identified, most of which are related to phytochemistry.

Furthermore, the average citation rate (percentage of publications that have been cited one or more times) of OA papers was lower than that of total papers and non-OA papers.

Conclusions.

China leads in number of publications; however, publication quality in ICM field requires improvement.

A few journals accounted for more than half of number of publications and citations, which are important for the development of ICM.

Many of the keywords in ICM noncited publications pointed towards broad meaning that poorly reflect the exact research content.

Most highly cited ICM studies focused on the identification and evaluation of plant active components.

OA may not be an effective approach to increase paper citations in the field of ICM.