Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia

Joint Authors

Hung, Chi-Chieh
Hsu, Yin-Chou
Lin, Kuo-Hsuan

Source

Emergency Medicine International

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-6, 6 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-10-26

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

6

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Patients with liver cirrhosis and bacteremia have substantially higher risk of mortality and morbidity.

Our study aimed to investigate scoring systems that can predict the mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis and bacteremia.

A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed among adult patients who visited the emergency department from January 2015 to December 2018.

All patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis and bacteremia were enrolled and divided into survivor and nonsurvivor groups for comparison based on their 30-day in-hospital mortality event.

The Pitt bacteremia score (PBS), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, Child–Pugh score, and quick sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score were calculated and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

A total of 127 patients (survivor: 86; nonsurvivor: 41) were eligible for this study.

Compared with the nonsurvivor group, patients in the survivor group had significantly lower MELD score (22 ± 7 vs.

29 ± 5, p<0.001), lower proportion of high qSOFA (score ≥ 2) (23.3% vs.

51.2%, p<0.01), and high PBS (score ≥ 4) (7.0% vs.

34.1%, p<0.001) category.

There was also a significantly different distribution in Child–Pugh classification between the two groups p<0.01.

The survivor group had significantly lower proportion of acute-on-chronic liver failure (27.9% vs.

68.3%, p<0.001) and fewer number of organ failures p<0.001.

In comparison of the discriminative ability in mortality risk prediction, PBS (AUROC = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.75–0.90, p<0.001) and MELD scores (AUROC = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70–0.86, p<0.001) revealed a better predictive ability than Child–Pugh (AUROC = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.59–0.70, p<0.01) and qSOFA scores (AUROC = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.54–0.75, p<0.01).

PBS and MELD scores both demonstrated a superior ability of predicting mortality risk in cirrhotic patients with bacteremia.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Hung, Chi-Chieh& Hsu, Yin-Chou& Lin, Kuo-Hsuan. 2020. Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia. Emergency Medicine International،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1159158

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Hung, Chi-Chieh…[et al.]. Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia. Emergency Medicine International No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1159158

American Medical Association (AMA)

Hung, Chi-Chieh& Hsu, Yin-Chou& Lin, Kuo-Hsuan. Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia. Emergency Medicine International. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1159158

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1159158