Recent Advances of Surfactant-Polymer (SP)‎ Flooding Enhanced Oil Recovery Field Tests in China

Abstract EN

Recently, there are increasing interests in chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) especially surfactant-polymer (SP) flooding.

Although alkali-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding can make an incremental oil recovery factor (IORF) of 18% original oil in place (OOIP) according to large-scale field tests in Daqing, the complex antiscaling and emulsion breaking technology as well as potential environment influence makes some people turn to alkali-free SP flooding.

With the benefit of high IORF in laboratory and no scaling issue to worry, SP flooding is theoretically better than ASP flooding when high quality surfactant is available.

Many SP flooding field tests have been conducted in China, where the largest chemical flooding application is reported.

10 typical large-scale SP flooding field tests were critically reviewed to help understand the benefit and challenge of SP flooding in low oil price era.

Among these 10 field tests, only one is conducted in Daqing Oilfield, although ASP flooding has entered the commercial application stage since 2014.

2 SP tests are conducted in Shengli Oilfield.

Both technical and economic parameters are used to evaluate these tests.

2 of these ten tests are very successful; the others were either technically or economically unsuccessful.

Although laboratory tests showed that SP flooding can attain IORF of more than 15%, the average predicted IORF for these 10 field tests was 12% OOIP.

Only two SP flooding tests in (SP 1 in Liaohe and SP 7 in Shengli) were reported actual IORF higher than 15% OOIP.

The field test in Shengli was so successful that many enlarged field tests and industrial applications were carried out, which finally lead to a commercial application of SP flooding in 2008.

However, other SP projects are not documented except two (SP7 and SP8).

SP flooding tests in low permeability reservoirs were not successful due to high surfactant adsorption.

It seems that SP flooding is not cost competitive as polymer flooding and ASP flooding if judged by utility factor (UF) and EOR cost.

Even the most technically and economically successful SP1 has a much higher cost than polymer flooding and ASP flooding, SP flooding is thus not cost competitive as previously expected.

The cost of SP flooding can be as high as ASP flooding, which indicates the importance of alkali.

How to reduce surfactant adsorption in SP flooding is very important to cost reduction.

It is high time to reevaluate the potential and suitable reservoir conditions for SP flooding.

The necessity of surfactant to get ultra-low interfacial tension for EOR remains further investigation.

This paper provides the petroleum industry with hard-to-get valuable information.