Tofacitinib versus Biologic Treatments in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Nonbiologic DMARDs: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Joint Authors

Bergrath, Evelien
Gerber, Robert A.
Gruben, David
Lukic, Tatjana
Makin, Charles
Wallenstein, Gene

Source

International Journal of Rheumatology

Issue

Vol. 2017, Issue 2017 (31 Dec. 2017), pp.1-15, 15 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2017-03-09

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

15

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Objective.

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as monotherapy and combined with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) versus biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and other novel DMARDs for second-line moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients by means of a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods.

MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and March 2015.

Efficacy data based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at 6 months, and discontinuation rates due to adverse events were analyzed by means of Bayesian NMAs.

Results.

45 RCTs were identified, the majority of which demonstrated a low risk of bias.

Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) and 10 mg BID monotherapy exhibited comparable efficacy and discontinuation rates due to adverse events versus other monotherapies.

Tofacitinib 5 mg BID and 10 mg BID + DMARDs or methotrexate (MTX) were mostly comparable to other combination therapies in terms of efficacy and discontinuation due to adverse events.

Conclusion.

In most cases, tofacitinib had similar efficacy and discontinuation rates due to adverse events compared to biologic DMARDs.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Bergrath, Evelien& Gerber, Robert A.& Gruben, David& Lukic, Tatjana& Makin, Charles& Wallenstein, Gene. 2017. Tofacitinib versus Biologic Treatments in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Nonbiologic DMARDs: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Rheumatology،Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-15.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1169386

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Bergrath, Evelien…[et al.]. Tofacitinib versus Biologic Treatments in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Nonbiologic DMARDs: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Rheumatology No. 2017 (2017), pp.1-15.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1169386

American Medical Association (AMA)

Bergrath, Evelien& Gerber, Robert A.& Gruben, David& Lukic, Tatjana& Makin, Charles& Wallenstein, Gene. Tofacitinib versus Biologic Treatments in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Nonbiologic DMARDs: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Rheumatology. 2017. Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-15.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1169386

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1169386