Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Joint Authors

Huang, Hans
Kovach, Christopher P.
Bell, Sean
Reisman, Mark
Aldea, Gabriel
McCabe, James M.
Dvir, Danny
Don, Creighton

Source

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-7, 7 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-11-03

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

7

Main Subjects

Diseases

Abstract EN

Objective.

To identify outcomes of patients undergoing emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Background.

Emergency TAVR has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for patients with decompensated severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation; however, data on patients undergoing emergency TAVR are limited.

Methods.

All emergency TAVR procedures were identified from a single tertiary academic center between January 2015 and August 2018.

Results.

31 patients underwent emergency TAVR due to cardiogenic shock (26 patients), electrical instability with incessant ventricular tachycardia (2 patients), severe refractory angina (2 patients), and decompensated heart failure with hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (1 patient).

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was used in 16 (51.6%).

MCS initiation occurred immediately prior to TAVR in 10 patients and placed post-TAVR in 6 patients.

6 patients died before hospital discharge (in-hospital mortality 19.4%).

1-year and 2-year survival rates were 61.0% and 55.9%, respectively.

Univariate predictors of in-hospital mortality were preprocedural pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) ≤1.8 (66.7% vs.

20.0%, p=0.01), intraprocedural cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (83.3% vs 4.0%, p≤0.001), acute kidney injury post-TAVR (80.0% vs.

4.2%, p≤0.001), initiation of dialysis post-TAVR (60.0% vs.

4.2%, p≤0.001), and MCS initiation post-TAVR (50.0% vs.

12.0%, p=0.03).

MCS initiation before TAVR was associated with improved survival compared with post-TAVR initiation.

Conclusion.

Emergency TAVR in extreme risk patients with acute decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock secondary to severe aortic valve disease is associated with high in-hospital mortality rates.

Careful patient selection taking into account right heart function, assessed by PAPi, and early utilization of MCS may improve survival following emergency TAVR.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Huang, Hans& Kovach, Christopher P.& Bell, Sean& Reisman, Mark& Aldea, Gabriel& McCabe, James M.…[et al.]. 2019. Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Journal of Interventional Cardiology،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1181271

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Huang, Hans…[et al.]. Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Journal of Interventional Cardiology No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1181271

American Medical Association (AMA)

Huang, Hans& Kovach, Christopher P.& Bell, Sean& Reisman, Mark& Aldea, Gabriel& McCabe, James M.…[et al.]. Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Journal of Interventional Cardiology. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1181271

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1181271