Values, Norms, and Peer Effects on Weight Status

Joint Authors

Gwozdz, Wencke
Nie, Peng
Sousa-Poza, Alfonso
Reisch, Lucia A.

Source

Journal of Obesity

Issue

Vol. 2017, Issue 2017 (31 Dec. 2017), pp.1-9, 9 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2017-02-28

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

9

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

This study uses data from the European Social Survey in order to test the Prinstein-Dodge hypothesis that posits that peer effects may be larger in collectivistic than in individualistic societies.

When defining individualism and collectivism at the country level, our results show that peer effects on obesity are indeed larger in collectivistic than in individualistic societies.

However, when defining individualism and collectivism with individual values based on the Shalom Schwartz universal values theory, we find little support for this hypothesis.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Nie, Peng& Gwozdz, Wencke& Reisch, Lucia A.& Sousa-Poza, Alfonso. 2017. Values, Norms, and Peer Effects on Weight Status. Journal of Obesity،Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1184267

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Nie, Peng…[et al.]. Values, Norms, and Peer Effects on Weight Status. Journal of Obesity No. 2017 (2017), pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1184267

American Medical Association (AMA)

Nie, Peng& Gwozdz, Wencke& Reisch, Lucia A.& Sousa-Poza, Alfonso. Values, Norms, and Peer Effects on Weight Status. Journal of Obesity. 2017. Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1184267

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1184267