Epiretinal Membrane Surgery in Daily Clinical Practice: Results of a Proposed Management Scheme

Joint Authors

Pareja, Jesús
Coronado, Alba
Contreras, Inés

Source

Journal of Ophthalmology

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-6, 6 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-01-10

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

6

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Purpose.

To report the results of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) management guidelines followed in our center.

Methods.

Patients with ERM seen between 2014 and 2015, with ≥2 years follow-up or who had undergone ERM surgery, were included.

Corrected visual acuity (VA), lens status, and ERM configuration were recorded at each visit.

Our guidelines for ERM are if VA is ≥20/30, observation is recommended unless there is moderate/intense metamorphopsia.

Vitrectomy is recommended during follow-up if there is a drop >one line in VA with changes in ERM configuration.

If VA at diagnosis is <20/30, vitrectomy is recommended.

If visual loss is thought to be due to cataract, phacoemulsification is performed first and visual status reevaluated.

Results.

Ninety-nine eyes of 94 patients were included; 52 eyes underwent vitrectomy, and 47 eyes were monitored.

From eyes with VA at diagnosis <20/30 (41 eyes), 8 eyes underwent isolated phacoemulsification: VA improved to ≥20/30.

Vitrectomy was recommended but refused by 4 patients.

The other 29 eyes underwent vitrectomy.

Of the 58 eyes with VA at diagnosis ≥20/30, 5 underwent surgery due to metamorphopsia.

Eighteen eyes underwent vitrectomy during follow-up.

VA improved a mean of 0.13 logMAR (SD 0.30) after vitrectomy.

There were no differences in mean VA improvement between eyes that underwent vitrectomy within six months of diagnosis (0.24, SD 0.32) and those that underwent surgery more than six months after diagnosis (mean 0.17, SD 0.17), p=0.106.

Three eyes developed postsurgical complications with visual loss: persistent macular edema in one eye, two consecutive retinal detachments in one eye, and a central visual defect in another eye.

At the end of follow-up, VA was similar in the observation group (0.14, SD 0.14) and in the vitrectomy group (0.16, SD 0.28), p=0.528.

Conclusions.

Our proposed guidelines lead to visual preservation in most patients while limiting surgery and its possible complications.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Pareja, Jesús& Coronado, Alba& Contreras, Inés. 2019. Epiretinal Membrane Surgery in Daily Clinical Practice: Results of a Proposed Management Scheme. Journal of Ophthalmology،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1186280

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Pareja, Jesús…[et al.]. Epiretinal Membrane Surgery in Daily Clinical Practice: Results of a Proposed Management Scheme. Journal of Ophthalmology No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1186280

American Medical Association (AMA)

Pareja, Jesús& Coronado, Alba& Contreras, Inés. Epiretinal Membrane Surgery in Daily Clinical Practice: Results of a Proposed Management Scheme. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1186280

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1186280