Cortical Tasks-Based Optimal Filter Selection: An fNIRS Study

Joint Authors

Khan, Muhammad Jawad
Zhang, Hongpo
Khan, Rayyan Azam
Naseer, Noman
Saleem, Sajid
Qureshi, Nauman Khalid

Source

Journal of Healthcare Engineering

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-15, 15 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-05-22

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

15

Main Subjects

Public Health
Medicine

Abstract EN

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is one of the latest noninvasive brain function measuring technique that has been used for the purpose of brain-computer interfacing (BCI).

In this paper, we compare and analyze the effect of six most commonly used filtering techniques (i.e., Gaussian, Butterworth, Kalman, hemodynamic response filter (hrf), Wiener, and finite impulse response) on classification accuracies of fNIRS-BCI.

To conclude with the best optimal filter for a specific cortical task owing to a specific cortical region, we divided our experimental tasks according to the three main cortical regions: prefrontal, motor, and visual cortex.

Three different experiments were performed for prefrontal and motor execution tasks while one for visual stimuli.

The tasks performed for prefrontal include rest (R) vs mental arithmetic (MA), R vs object rotation (OB), and OB vs MA.

Similarly, for motor execution, R vs left finger tapping (LFT), R vs right finger tapping (RFT), and LFT vs RFT.

Likewise, for the visual cortex, R vs visual stimuli (VS) task.

These experiments were performed for ten trials with five subjects.

For consistency among extracted data, six statistical features were evaluated using oxygenated hemoglobin, namely, slope, mean, peak, kurtosis, skewness, and variance.

Combination of these six features was used to classify data by the nonlinear support vector machine (SVM).

The classification accuracies obtained from SVM by using hrf and Gaussian were significantly higher for R vs MA, R vs OB, R vs RFT, and R vs VS and Wiener filter for OB vs MA.

Similarly, for R vs LFT and LFT vs RFT, hrf was found to be significant p<0.05.

These results show the feasibility of using hrf for effective removal of noises from fNIRS data.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Khan, Rayyan Azam& Naseer, Noman& Saleem, Sajid& Qureshi, Nauman Khalid& Zhang, Hongpo& Khan, Muhammad Jawad. 2020. Cortical Tasks-Based Optimal Filter Selection: An fNIRS Study. Journal of Healthcare Engineering،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-15.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1186696

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Khan, Rayyan Azam…[et al.]. Cortical Tasks-Based Optimal Filter Selection: An fNIRS Study. Journal of Healthcare Engineering No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-15.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1186696

American Medical Association (AMA)

Khan, Rayyan Azam& Naseer, Noman& Saleem, Sajid& Qureshi, Nauman Khalid& Zhang, Hongpo& Khan, Muhammad Jawad. Cortical Tasks-Based Optimal Filter Selection: An fNIRS Study. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-15.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1186696

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1186696