Comparison of the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Pediatric Eyes in Children of Different Ages

Joint Authors

Zhao, Yune
Kou, Jiaojiao
Chang, Pingjun
Lin, Lei
Li, Zhangliang
Fu, Yana

Source

Journal of Ophthalmology

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-6, 6 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-07-27

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

6

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Purpose.

This study aims to compare the accuracy of five intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Haigis, and Holladay 2) for pediatric eyes in children of different ages.

Methods.

In this prospective study, patients who received cataract surgery and IOL implantation in the capsular bag were enrolled.

We compared the calculation accuracy of 5 formulas at 1 month postoperatively and performed subgroup analysis with the patients divided into three groups according to their ages at the time of surgery as follows: group 1 (age ≤ 2 years, 35 eyes), group 2 (2 years < age < 5 years, 38 eyes), and group 3 (age > 5 years, 29 eyes).

Results.

75 patients (102 eyes) were enrolled in this study.

The Haigis formula got the smallest PE among all formulas in all three groups.

With regard to APE, there were no statistical differences among the formulas except group 2, with the SRK/T formula a little smaller, the Holladay 2 formula a little larger in group 1, and the Haigis formula a little smaller in group 3.

In group 2, the Haigis formula had the lowest APE (0.87 ± 0.61 D), while the Holladay 2 formula had the largest (1.71 ± 1.20 D, p<0.001), followed by the Holladay 1 formula (1.51 ± 1.07 D, p=0.002).

On comparing the percentage of APE within 0.5 D and 1.0 D obtained with 5 formulas in each group, there were no statistical differences.

The SRK/T formula and the Holladay 1 formula showed the highest percentage (40.00% and 60.00%) in group 1.

While the Haigis formula got the highest percentage in less than 0.5 D (34.21%) and less than 1 D (60.53%) in group 2.

In group 3, the Holladay 2 formula and the Haigis formula got the highest percentage less than 0.5 D (58.62%) and less than 1 D (79.31%).

The multiple linear regression indicated that the age at the time of surgery was a significant factor affecting the accuracy of APE; after removing the age, AL was the only factor that affected the accuracy of APE.

Conclusion.

The SRK/T and the Holladay 1 formulas were relatively accurate in patients younger than 2 years old, while the Haigis formula performed better in patients older than 2.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Kou, Jiaojiao& Chang, Pingjun& Lin, Lei& Li, Zhangliang& Fu, Yana& Zhao, Yune. 2020. Comparison of the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Pediatric Eyes in Children of Different Ages. Journal of Ophthalmology،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1189784

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Kou, Jiaojiao…[et al.]. Comparison of the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Pediatric Eyes in Children of Different Ages. Journal of Ophthalmology No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1189784

American Medical Association (AMA)

Kou, Jiaojiao& Chang, Pingjun& Lin, Lei& Li, Zhangliang& Fu, Yana& Zhao, Yune. Comparison of the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Pediatric Eyes in Children of Different Ages. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1189784

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1189784