Comparison between High- and Low-Cost Transmission of Tele-Anesthesia in Japan

Abstract EN

Background.

We previously reported a tele-anesthesia system that connected Sado General Hospital (SGH) to Yokohama City University Hospital (YCUH) using a dedicated virtual private network (VPN) that guaranteed the quality of service.

The study indicated certain unresolved problems, such as the high cost of constantly using a dedicated VPN for tele-anesthesia.

In this study, we assessed whether use of a best-effort system affects the safety and cost of tele-anesthesia in a clinical setting.

Methods.

One hundred patients were enrolled in this study.

We provided tele-anesthesia for 65 patients using a guaranteed transmission system (20 Mbit/s; guaranteed, 372,000 JPY per month: 1 JPY = US$0.01) and for 35 patients using a best-effort system (100 Mbit/s; not guaranteed, 25,000 JPY per month).

We measured transmission speed and number of commands completed from YCUH to SGH during tele-anesthesia with both transmission systems.

Results.

In the guaranteed system, anesthesia duration was 5780 min (88.9 min/case) and surgical duration was 3513 min (54.0 min/case).

In the best-effort system, anesthesia duration was 3725 min (106.4 min/case) and surgical duration was 2105 min (60.1 min/case).

The average transmission speed in the best-effort system was 17.3 ± 3.8 Mbit/s.

The system provided an acceptable delay time and frame rate in clinical use.

All commands were completed, and no adverse events occurred with both systems.

Discussion.

In the field of tele-anesthesia, using a best-effort internet VPN system provided equivalent safety and efficacy at a better price as compared to using a guaranteed internet VPN system.