On the Use of Compound and Extracted Models in Thermal Dosimetry Assessment

Joint Authors

Cvetković, Mario
Dodig, Hrvoje
Poljak, Dragan

Source

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-18, 18 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-08-17

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

18

Main Subjects

Civil Engineering

Abstract EN

This paper deals with thermal analysis of realistic models of the human eye and brain using the finite element method.

The research presented in this paper is the sequel to the electromagnetic dosimetry model presented in the previous work by the authors.

The paper presents the numerical results for the specific absorption rate (SAR) and the related temperature increase in various models of the human eye and the brain/head exposed to high-frequency (HF) electromagnetic (EM) radiation.

Based on the numerical results for the induced electric field, the distribution of SAR in the human brain and human eye is determined, subsequently used as input to the thermal model.

The thermal dosimetry model of both the brain and eye are based on the form of Pennes’ bioheat transfer equation, numerically solved using the finite element method (FEM).

The comparison between the extracted models and the compound models of both the eye and brain, placed inside the realistic head model is presented.

In case of the human eye, generally, comparable results were obtained for both SAR and temperature increase, while the compound eye model is found to be more suitable when the polarization of incident wave is considered.

Moreover, the extracted eye model underestimated the temperature rise, attributed to better heat exchange than the compound model.

The results for the compound eye indicate that in some situations, the eye lens could be omitted from simulation, facilitating the model preparation.

The numerical results for all three brain models showed similar distributions of SAR and temperature rise.

Also, the obtained results show that the peak SAR does not exceed the basic restriction limit for localized SAR, for occupational exposure.

The thermal dosimetry assessment of the human brain exposed in four considered scenarios indicates the temperature should not exceed 0.1°C.

Finally, the use of a geometrically simplified model may also be found useful in the initial dosimetry assessment prior to dealing with models with more anatomical features.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Cvetković, Mario& Dodig, Hrvoje& Poljak, Dragan. 2020. On the Use of Compound and Extracted Models in Thermal Dosimetry Assessment. Mathematical Problems in Engineering،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1201462

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Cvetković, Mario…[et al.]. On the Use of Compound and Extracted Models in Thermal Dosimetry Assessment. Mathematical Problems in Engineering No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1201462

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cvetković, Mario& Dodig, Hrvoje& Poljak, Dragan. On the Use of Compound and Extracted Models in Thermal Dosimetry Assessment. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1201462

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1201462