When Do Orthopaedic Oncologists Consider the Implantation of Expandable Prostheses in Bone Sarcoma Patients?

Abstract EN

Introduction.

Indications discussed for the implantation of expandable prostheses in bone sarcoma patients are unclear.

This survey aimed to analyse common practice with this implant type in orthopaedic oncology.

Methods.

A web-based survey was sent to 98 orthopaedic oncology surgeons.

Factors reported in literature to influence the decision on the implantation of a growing prosthesis were covered in individual questions and three case scenarios.

Results.

The completion rate of the survey was 45% (n = 44).

Twenty-seven of 44 surgeons (61%) had implanted between 1 and 15 expandable prostheses within three years.

The minimum median patient age was 6.5 years, and 3–5 cm of predicted growth deficit was the minimum before implanting a growing prosthesis.

One-third of surgeons do not use growth calculation methods.

Two out of three surgeons would rather not implant a growing prosthesis in children with metastatic disease.

Conclusions.

Our survey confirmed the literature with 3-4 cm as the minimum estimated growth deficit.

The minimum age for the implantation of a growing prosthesis is approx.

6.6 years, and therefore the patients are younger than those reported in previous publications.

One-quarter of orthopaedic surgeons do not use growing prostheses at all.

It remains unclear whether growing prostheses are indicated in patients with metastatic disease.