How Much FBMCOQAM Is Better than FBMCQAM? A Tentative Response Using the POPS Paradigm

Joint Authors

Abdelkefi, Fatma
Siala, Mohamed
Khrouf, Wafa

Source

Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing

Issue

Vol. 2018, Issue 2018 (31 Dec. 2018), pp.1-14, 14 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2018-04-10

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

14

Main Subjects

Information Technology and Computer Science

Abstract EN

A major trend of the current research in 5G is to find well time and frequency localized waveforms, dedicated to non-orthogonal wireless multi-carrier systems.

The ping-pong optimized pulse shaping (POPS) paradigm was proposed as a powerful technique to generate a family of waveforms, ensuring an optimal signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) at the receiver.

In this paper, we derive, for the first time, the analytical expression of the SINR for FBMC/OQAM systems.

We then adopt the POPS algorithm in the design of optimum transmit and receive waveforms for FBMC/OQAM, with respect to the SINR criterion.

For relatively high dispersions, numerical results show that the optimized waveforms provide a gain of 7 dB, in terms of SINR, compared to the PHYDYAS waveform.

They also show that the obtained waveforms offer better out-of-band (OOB) emissions with regard to those of the IOTA waveform.

Furthermore, we notice that FBMC/OQAM systems present a gain of 4 dB in SINR, compared to FBMC/QAM systems, when both operate at their time-frequency lattice critical densities.

However, FBMC/QAM systems can guarantee, with a reduced computational complexity, a comparable performance to FBMC/OQAM systems, in terms of SINR, when their spectral efficiency is relatively reduced by less than 5%.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Khrouf, Wafa& Siala, Mohamed& Abdelkefi, Fatma. 2018. How Much FBMCOQAM Is Better than FBMCQAM? A Tentative Response Using the POPS Paradigm. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing،Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-14.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1216040

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Khrouf, Wafa…[et al.]. How Much FBMCOQAM Is Better than FBMCQAM? A Tentative Response Using the POPS Paradigm. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing No. 2018 (2018), pp.1-14.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1216040

American Medical Association (AMA)

Khrouf, Wafa& Siala, Mohamed& Abdelkefi, Fatma. How Much FBMCOQAM Is Better than FBMCQAM? A Tentative Response Using the POPS Paradigm. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. 2018. Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-14.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1216040

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1216040