المفارقة و خطاب الضد في شعر نزار قباني : مقاربة تحليلية نقدية

Abstract EN

This study hypothesizes that «irony» and «the discourse of Antithesis» are two sides of the same coin.

This does not imply that they are identical.

Rather, they represent the same value.

Every side has its own features.

Therefore, they arc two images of the same subject, namely contrast in its general sense.

Both are transformative and generative discourse structures based on the concept of «contrast».

These two discourse structures have generalities and specificities.

«Discourse of Antithesis» as a phenomenon is more general and comprehensive than «Irony».

The poetic discourse of Nizar Qabbani is, in general, a discourse of contrast that is manifested through a number of techniques, the most prominent of which is «irony» technique in its various features.

Highlighting the similarities and differences between them will be done through studying each of them separately.

The presence track of each will be made clear.

The study is not contrastive but rather analytical and critical in the sense that it reveals the salient features of «irony» on the one hand, and the presence of «the discourse of antithesis» in all its forms on the other hand.

This critical study will follow the descriptive and analytical approach and will take the advantage of the psychological approach to uncover the motives of Nizar Qabbani in his use of «irony» and the «discourse of contrast» in his poems.