ملامح الظاهراتية في الشعر العباسي : عرض و تحليل

Abstract EN

The artistic discourse does not copy .

The linguistic form as it is ,but it tries to submit it for specific contextual rules which create a kind of misunderstanding for the receiver which leads him ther to an effective situation for not consuming the discourse which constructs a very strong linkage between the discourse and the in other words ,the discourse tackles the linguistic form and how to join it romantically through which the remove will be spread and which creates a kind of ambiguity between the discourse and receiver or between the discourse and what the readers think that it is correct.

Meanwhile, the relation is based on the work and discourse being possessed byany individual within a particular society but no one can say that he / she possesses, in other words , the possession of discourse is in general but not specific The producer or the writer , the discourse and the receiver do have the right of drawing the boundaries of the discourse identity depending on the nature of the relation among them in the case of when the producer is selfish towards the other sides of the equation then the producer or the writer will be bias.

In the case of the discourse being concentrated the relation between the other two elements , then it will lead to wards the variety of semantics of the discourse taking into account the centralism which is existed within side accompanied by another side of the discourse poetic production it will differ from the dominated profession which was tackled and being discussed by Jacobson, the first kind of the discourse is based on the effective challenge between the civil constituents and the absent saying within the discourse both sides of informing and receipt ion will affect or being reflected upon an effective personality which , in turn will affect the ather side.