Domains of judgment upon the expert’s opinion in contemporary financial transactions : Murabaha to purchase orderer, and contracting companies as examples

Abstract EN

This research discusses an important contemporary issue' namely' the domains of making judgments upon expert's opinion in contemporary financial transactions.

Both researchers start by presenting the concept of the expert' revealing its types' clarifying its terms' and determining the extent of its power.

The researchers then discuss the domains of referring to expert's opinions relevant to two questions of contemporary financial transactions' namely: Murabaha to purchase orderer and contracting companies.

This paper draws a number of findings' the most important of which are: Expert's opinion can be referred to in indemnity for damages in Murabaha to the purchase orderer in two cases: indemnity for financial damages caused by the financial institution' such as: returning defective merchandise.

The second case is: indemnity for financial damages caused by the purchase orderer such as: the buyer's abstention from buying the items ordered for purchase.

In contracting companies' expert's opinion is referred to in two cases as well: first: indemnity for financial damages caused by contracting companies' such as: compensation for not completing the contract.

The second case is: compensation for financial damages caused by the client' such as: compensation for not enabling the contractor to complete the contract