النقد الفلسفي للتفسير اللاهوتي للتاريخ

Other Title(s)

The philosophical criticism of the theological interpretation of history

Author

طالب محمد كريم

Source

دراسات فلسفية

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 43 (30 Jun. 2019), pp.103-120, 18 p.

Publisher

Bayt al-Hikma Department of Philosophical Studies

Publication Date

2019-06-30

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

18

Main Subjects

Philosophy

Abstract AR

يخوض جوهر بحثنا الذي بين ايدينا حول أبرز المشكلات الفكرية التي نشأت مع بدايات الوعي الانساني ومحاولة استنطاق الاشياء المحيطة به تارة والتي يتعامل معها بشكل مباشر تارة اخرى.

هذه المشكلة التي تتضمن اسئلة كثيرة تراكمت مع المسار التاريخي والاجتماعي للإنسان.

سؤال البداية والخلق الى فهم العالم والمصير، مرورا بفكرة الحرية والخلود هذه الاسئلة الكبيرة التي لطالما اقلقت الانسان وجعلت منه كائنا مرتبكا" قلقا" خائفا" مرة ومتشائما" مرة أخرى.

باحثا عن سر صانع الاحداث التاريخية الانسانية منها (عناصر التاريخ الانسان والزمان والمكان وفرادة الحدث، والطبيعية منها (الأحداث الكبيرة والصغيرة والطبيعية).

Abstract EN

When we deal with the problem of historical consciousness, we find that it automatically brings us to the history of human consciousness which internalizes the philosophical thinking about the origins and the relationship of human intersecting with nature on one hand and the world on the other.

In an attempt by philosophy to employ its arguments to answer the problems raised by the mind and which have a relationship between the awareness of history sometimes and man at other times.

The idea that history is subject to natural or supernatural laws, and every event of human life is an element of a necessary model, an idea of metaphysical origins.

All the fascination with the natural sciences feeds this trend, but it is not its only and fundamental source.

There is a vision that is rooted in the beginnings of human thought which goes to the end of the chain of events and causes according to the plan that it was designed to be.

Everything is understood and described from the first movement of the process of events and that human beings and all living things and perhaps even rigid objects-have functions that seek certain purposes and are not imposed on them outside the world or human nature or physical nature.

The actions are responsible for making the historical event.

The imposition of historical models framed and ready as if they represent history is unacceptable from the non-historical trend as they see that history is constantly changing and this change is due to the change of laws that form the general framework of the movement of history according to the logic of evolution.

In another challenge no less important than other arguments is the "prediction that teams of researchers have split into three that is between an optimistic teamla pessimistic team and a team that shunned and distanced itself from bath.

This inability to foresee a precise future of events is due to the search for historical facts in order to gain knowledge of the basic factors that control the logic of history.

And then work on the development of general laws fixed that shape the present and the future image of social life.

American Psychological Association (APA)

طالب محمد كريم. 2019. النقد الفلسفي للتفسير اللاهوتي للتاريخ. دراسات فلسفية،مج. 2019، ع. 43، ص ص. 103-120.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1229513

Modern Language Association (MLA)

طالب محمد كريم. النقد الفلسفي للتفسير اللاهوتي للتاريخ. دراسات فلسفية ع. 43 (حزيران 2019)، ص ص. 103-120.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1229513

American Medical Association (AMA)

طالب محمد كريم. النقد الفلسفي للتفسير اللاهوتي للتاريخ. دراسات فلسفية. 2019. مج. 2019، ع. 43، ص ص. 103-120.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1229513

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

Arabic

Notes

يتضمن هوامش: ص. 117-118

Record ID

BIM-1229513