بعض مظاهر الجدال و النزاع في تاريخ النقد العربي القديم : -النحاة، النقاد و الشعراء-أنموذجا

Abstract EN

This research tries to shade light on the aspects of the derailment of the eloquent discourse on the stream of the righteousness in the structure of the discourse.

Melody and aberration have been spread within the Arabic environment as it was an intensive danger.

After the Arabs, after a while, were speaking their innate and temper language; they were needless to grammar; to adjust their language.

However, after the coming of the Islam, they mixed out with the foreigners so that the melody had spread.

After that, the language Jealous were afraid of their language to be corrupted.

As a result, they thought to put rules to maintain the tongue and the pen and save them from mislead.

This latter, made it a necessity to know the grammar and its rules.

Moreover, the linguists took this hard mission into their part and their sources and raw materials was the pottery.

Grammarians had a significant role in this later, until it had spread among them and the poets on one hand, and the critics in other hand, a danger conflict and struggle claiming that they are not in charge to deal with this discipline to criticize the pottery.

Moreover, this study also aims to shed light on the aspects and causes of the conflicts that arose between grammarians and poets on the one hand, and between grammarians and critics on the other hand.

The research is divided into five sections, the first one which is devoted to the extremism of the linguists and grammarians, as they used to revolt against anything that contradicts their established rules.

As for the second part, I put it into discounts of Farazdaq, because he was the biggest poet in conflict with the grammarians, and the third section is devoted to the disputes and rivalries of the poet Bashar Ibin Barad with the linguists.