A critical discourse analysis of some persuasive strategies of Ashton Carter's 2016 political speech on Iraq and Syria unrest

Other Title(s)

تحليل خطابي نقدي لبعض أساليب الإقناع في خطاب أشتون كارتر السياسي في عام 2016 حول العراق و سوريا

Joint Authors

Ishaq, Rami Isa
al-Saati, Nashwan Mustafa

Source

Adab al-Rafidayn

Issue

Vol. 50, Issue 81 (30 Jun. 2020), pp.1-16, 16 p.

Publisher

University of Mosul College of Arts

Publication Date

2020-06-30

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

16

Main Subjects

Literature

Topics

Abstract AR

يضم الخطاب السياسي بين جنباته سمات لابد أن يدركها المخاطبون، وينبغي أن يكون الخطاب مقنعاً لهم، وتهدف هذه الدراسة إلى تحليل ثلاثة أساليب إقناعية خطابية في خطاب (أشتون كارتر) السياسي في عام 2016 حول الصراع في العراق وسوريا، فضلاً عن إيجاد الإيديولوجيات الضمنية في الخطاب.

هذه الأساليب الخطابية هي التكرار والمجاز والمنطق الاقناعي، وإن النموذج المُتبنّى لتحليل هذا الخطاب هو التحليل النقدي للخطاب لـ (ڨان دايك) لعام 2000 م، وتفترض هذه الدراسة أن يكون خطاب (كارتر) السياسي تعبيرياً عاطفياً ومنطقياً، وأنه مُصوّغ على أساس إيديولوجي، وقد توصلت هذه الدراسة إلى أن استراتيجية المنطق الاقناعي كانت الأكثر تكراراً والتي من خلالها التجيء (كارتر) للتحدث بالمنطق وسرد الحقائق لإقناع مستمعيه للانحياز إلى وجهة نظره.

Abstract EN

Political discourse contains features that should be understood by the audience, but it must fulfill the purpose of persuading the audience.

This study examines three of Ashton Carter's discourse strategies of persuasion in his 2016's political speech on Iraq and Syria unrest, as well as the implicit ideologies.

These discourse strategies are repetition, metaphor and appeal to logic.

The model adopted to analyze the speech is critical discourse analysis under the impact of Van Dijk's perspective.

The study hypothesizes that Carter's political speech is emotionally and logically expressive and that his speech is ideologically structured.

The results have shown that Carter was so impressive in persuading his listeners due to the use of the three persuasive strategies.

The results have also shown that the strategy of appeal to logic was the most frequent among others, through which he resorted to speaking logically and stating facts to make his listeners believe him and drive them at his stance.

American Psychological Association (APA)

al-Saati, Nashwan Mustafa& Ishaq, Rami Isa. 2020. A critical discourse analysis of some persuasive strategies of Ashton Carter's 2016 political speech on Iraq and Syria unrest. Adab al-Rafidayn،Vol. 50, no. 81, pp.1-16.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1253772

Modern Language Association (MLA)

al-Saati, Nashwan Mustafa& Ishaq, Rami Isa. A critical discourse analysis of some persuasive strategies of Ashton Carter's 2016 political speech on Iraq and Syria unrest. Adab al-Rafidayn Vol. 50, no. 81 (Jun. 2020), pp.1-16.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1253772

American Medical Association (AMA)

al-Saati, Nashwan Mustafa& Ishaq, Rami Isa. A critical discourse analysis of some persuasive strategies of Ashton Carter's 2016 political speech on Iraq and Syria unrest. Adab al-Rafidayn. 2020. Vol. 50, no. 81, pp.1-16.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1253772

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references : p. 14-15

Record ID

BIM-1253772