التعديل على الإبهام عند علماء الحديث : دراسة نظرية تطبيقية

Abstract EN

The current research aims to explain the methodology of Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar in citing the isnads, and ambiguous narrators, and his statement to these narrators through the part to be studied.

Enriching the Islamic library with research that deals with one of the branches of the term hadith, namely, speaking on the thumb in general, and the nature of the research necessitated dividing it into: introduction, theoretical study, and conclusion: the introduction includes the importance of the research, the reasons for choosing it, its objectives, its limits, previous studies, and a plan Research, methodology, procedures, and finally definition of its terminology.

As for the amendment and documentation on the thumb, and it has four demands: The first requirement: What is meant by the amendment to the thumb.

The second requirement: the sayings of the scholars in amending the thumb.

The third requirement: the reasons for adjusting the thumb.

Fourth requirement: Amendment formulas on the thumb.

The research used the inductive, analytical and critical approach.

The research has reached conclusions, the most important of which are: The issue of the thumb in the amendment form in which there is a dispute between scholars between supporters, opponents, and supporters with conditions.

The most correct - and God knows best - is not to accept the narration of the thumb on the amendment.

Because he may have weak trust with others, so if the scholar says trust me, or all my sheikhs say they are trustworthy, then he narrated on the authority of one of them and did not name him, he did not accept him in either case.

The ambiguous is also known through several methods, namely: its name is mentioned in some other narrations, or by the use of the people of hadith, biography and the magazines on many of them, and they may have inferred another hadith in which a specific was attributed to that enigmatic narrator.

As for the most correct saying in defining the companion: that the companion is the one who met the Prophet believing in him and died in Islam, even if the apostasy interspersed in the more correct, and this is what Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar decided, and al-Sakhawi supported it.