تعاضد آليات التأويل و مقومات التعليل في نقد الخطاب النحوي عند ابن ولاد : دراسة في بعض المسائل من كتابه الانتصار

Abstract EN

Two do not compete that attributing a description of any discourse to the reference that emerges from it is referred to the context in which it was produced, and consider the issues and matters that it raises.

If this is settled, the opinions and articles of the ancient grammarians are grammatical, and like all kinds of discourse, it is the product of human thought that is negotiable and subject to criticism.

Criticism regardless of its multiple directions and goals, remains an analytical practice that requires the critic to synthesize a set of mechanisms to distinguish the strong from the weak, and the followed from the motivated from words and opinions.

This is what the article aims to show through the critical practice of Ibn Walad in his book “The Victory of Siboyeh” over Al Mubarrad, by highlighting the synergy between the mechanisms of interpretation and the elements of reasoning.