جرائم جلسات المحاكم : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

Courts sessions crimes are meant as every act or omission that constitutes a crime committed by persons, whether they are parties to the criminal case, such as the complainant, the accused, or their attorneys from the attorneys or others present in the court session or by entities such as if it is committed by the court, such as the judge or the plaintiff.

Or one of the court employees, whether this crime constitutes a violation, misdemeanor, or a felony that would obstruct the progress of the trial and thus hinder the work of the judiciary in reaching justice or reduce the prestige of the court.

Iraqi legislation has given criminal courts with regard to courts sessions crimes to initiate criminal cases, investigate and conduct the trial, as well as adjudicate them, but within certain limits, and it also gives these courts the authority to address crimes committed during their session, as an exception to the principle of separation Between the powers of accusation and the investigation, because the court in whose session the crime takes place is the most capable of proving this crime and adjudicating it, In addition the Iraqi legislator has expanded the authority Criminal courts, each according to the type of crime and the court.

The Iraqi Legislature has given the crimes of court sessions its own procedural rules, which are the rules of professional and gender competence and in terms of persons, the rules of case movement, investigation, trial, appeals against judgments, and rules for complaints by judges and their response.

The study of this research was an analytical study of Iraqi legislation, including the Penal Code No.

(111) of 1969 amended, the Code of Criminal Procedure No.

(23) of 1971 amended, and the rest of the other procedural laws with comparison with the texts of Egyptian criminal and civil legislation and touching on some provisions of the constitution and the Iranian penal code.