التعادل و الرتجيح عند الفقهاء

Author

عليوي، نافع سعيد محمد

Source

مجلة القادسية في الآداب و العلوم التربوية

Issue

Vol. 21, Issue 2، ج. 2 (30 Jun. 2021), pp.1-18, 18 p.

Publisher

University of al-Qadisiyah College of Education

Publication Date

2021-06-30

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

18

Main Subjects

Islamic Studies

Abstract EN

The research that showed our hands underscores the importance of the issue of contradictory legal evidence to the fundamentalists and its effect on the jurisprudential deduction and the jurisprudential effects it entails.

Because the legal rulings are incompatible with one another, and it has been reported on the authority of the imams: contradictory reports, and the reason for these narratives contradictory is due to several reasons.

The most important of them is the pious one that the imams used to work with: Fearing the ruling authority, and the other reason is due to fabricating hadiths and attributing them to them, For these reasons and other reasons, the contradiction was mentioned in the legal news.

And for that, the topic (Equalization and Weighting) was found, which is a general rule applied by the jurists to get rid of the contradiction in the evidence of legal rulings.

Key Words: (Draw, Weight, Contradiction, Even)

American Psychological Association (APA)

عليوي، نافع سعيد محمد. 2021. التعادل و الرتجيح عند الفقهاء. مجلة القادسية في الآداب و العلوم التربوية،مج. 21، ع. 2، ج. 2، ص ص. 1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1269698

Modern Language Association (MLA)

عليوي، نافع سعيد محمد. التعادل و الرتجيح عند الفقهاء. مجلة القادسية في الآداب و العلوم التربوية مج. 21، ع. 2، ج. 2 (2021)، ص ص. 1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1269698

American Medical Association (AMA)

عليوي، نافع سعيد محمد. التعادل و الرتجيح عند الفقهاء. مجلة القادسية في الآداب و العلوم التربوية. 2021. مج. 21، ع. 2، ج. 2، ص ص. 1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1269698

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

Arabic

Notes

-

Record ID

BIM-1269698