التعادل و الرتجيح عند الفقهاء
Author
Source
مجلة القادسية في الآداب و العلوم التربوية
Issue
Vol. 21, Issue 2، ج. 2 (30 Jun. 2021), pp.1-18, 18 p.
Publisher
University of al-Qadisiyah College of Education
Publication Date
2021-06-30
Country of Publication
Iraq
No. of Pages
18
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
The research that showed our hands underscores the importance of the issue of contradictory legal evidence to the fundamentalists and its effect on the jurisprudential deduction and the jurisprudential effects it entails.
Because the legal rulings are incompatible with one another, and it has been reported on the authority of the imams: contradictory reports, and the reason for these narratives contradictory is due to several reasons.
The most important of them is the pious one that the imams used to work with: Fearing the ruling authority, and the other reason is due to fabricating hadiths and attributing them to them, For these reasons and other reasons, the contradiction was mentioned in the legal news.
And for that, the topic (Equalization and Weighting) was found, which is a general rule applied by the jurists to get rid of the contradiction in the evidence of legal rulings.
Key Words: (Draw, Weight, Contradiction, Even)
American Psychological Association (APA)
عليوي، نافع سعيد محمد. 2021. التعادل و الرتجيح عند الفقهاء. مجلة القادسية في الآداب و العلوم التربوية،مج. 21، ع. 2، ج. 2، ص ص. 1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1269698
Modern Language Association (MLA)
عليوي، نافع سعيد محمد. التعادل و الرتجيح عند الفقهاء. مجلة القادسية في الآداب و العلوم التربوية مج. 21، ع. 2، ج. 2 (2021)، ص ص. 1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1269698
American Medical Association (AMA)
عليوي، نافع سعيد محمد. التعادل و الرتجيح عند الفقهاء. مجلة القادسية في الآداب و العلوم التربوية. 2021. مج. 21، ع. 2، ج. 2، ص ص. 1-18.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1269698
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
-
Record ID
BIM-1269698