الحجاج بالمحال و الاحتكام إليه في رد القضايا النحوية

Abstract EN

The lack of acceptance of grammatical opinions on all sides gave enough room for grammarians to use different arguments to respond to them, so they varied and differed according to different rulings.

It was approved that responding to cases of definitive response does not rely on the possibility.

Some of the conclusions are related to the corruption of the meaning, while the other part came to be related to the issue of the worker, the delay and presentation, and breaching the origin of grammar.

Therefore, relying on the argumentative approach is an important matter for grammarians in a sense that it led them to the sharpness of intelligence, breadth of thought, and audacity of expression, building communication in speech between the speaker and the addressee, as well as achieving the benefit from it.