العلاقة بين الاستئمان و قاعدة الضمان على اليد

Abstract EN

One of the privileges of Imamiyah jurisprudence is the subjective classification of topics and the presentation of rules for the ordering of the Shari'a rulings.

It has long been the case that jurists have sought to derive partial rulings from these kidney rules by collecting jurisprudential rules.

One of the rules that has been spoken and used in various jurisprudential jurisprudence such as the testimony, trust, is the rule of discipline which appeared in the phrase "Trustee should only swear" has found.

Despite the fame of this rule and its wide application in jurisprudence and law, there are many disputes about it.

These discrepancies sometimes extend to the point where their regularity is compromised.

Some have considered the iodine as an exception to the rule of iodine, not an independent jurisprudential rule.

The rule or its exception to the jurisprudential rule is not a theoretical discussion but has many practical implications.

In this study, we sought to answer the question, what is the relationship between Estimân and A lal-yad's guarantee? A descriptive-analytical study reveals that adherence is an independent jurisprudential rule with its specific rulings and effects.