قاعدة: "ما جاز لعذر بطل بزواله "وتطبيقاتها المعاصرة

Abstract EN

This research focuses on an important legal maxim, that covers both traditional and contemporary jurisprudential issues, namely the rule of “what is permissible for an excuse, for a nullifies for the demise of the excuse” in terms of concept, legitimacy, types of excuses that allow using legal easements, regulations of consideration in terms of Sharia, and old and contemporary jurisprudential cases, mainly cases related to the Covid-19 (Corona) pandemic.

In dealing with research topics, the researcher pursued multiple approaches, the most important of which is the inductive approach that relies on tracking the contents of the legal maxim in its original sources, and then the analytical approach that is based on analyzing the legal literature linked to the rule, its applications, and clarifying its meanings.

The prominent finding was "the legal maxim of what is permissible for an excuse, for a nullifies for the demise of the excuse ", stating that the excuse with which the dilutions is permissible is removed by the demise of the excuse, and the regular duty is Retrieved, and that the emergency excuse through which the taxpayer is permitted to take the easement is not based on one scale, rather it varies from one case to onether, and that the legal maxim has contemporary applications, especially in the current spreading epidemic, where the rules of worship have undergone many changes due to it.