![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
قابلية النزاع للتحكيم كشرط لصحة اتفاق التحكيم الإلكتروني و التقليدي
Author
Source
Issue
Vol. 9, Issue 9 (31 May. 2021), pp.3183-3200, 18 p.
Publisher
Cairo University Faculty of Law (Khartoum Branch)
Publication Date
2021-05-31
Country of Publication
Sudan
No. of Pages
18
Main Subjects
Topics
Abstract EN
The subjectivity of the dispute to arbitration is considered one of the substantive and important conditions for the validity of the arbitration agreement in its two types (whether traditional or electronic).
Arbitration is not permissible in matters related to personal status (except for financial issues related to it such as spending), and arbitration may not be made in matters that violate the internal public order in the country in which the judgment is to be executed, and arbitration is not permissible in matters of minor jurisdiction even if it is permissible to arbitrate in matters of competence.
Subscriber.
These are the determinants of the extent to which the dispute can be resolved through arbitration, whether it was agreed to resort to arbitration through the conclusion of an electronic arbitration agreement, or it was agreed upon by concluding a traditional arbitration agreement
American Psychological Association (APA)
جيلاني، أحمد مصطفى حسن. 2021. قابلية النزاع للتحكيم كشرط لصحة اتفاق التحكيم الإلكتروني و التقليدي. المجلة القانونية،مج. 9، ع. 9، ص ص. 3183-3200.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1303697
Modern Language Association (MLA)
جيلاني، أحمد مصطفى حسن. قابلية النزاع للتحكيم كشرط لصحة اتفاق التحكيم الإلكتروني و التقليدي. المجلة القانونية مج. 9، ع. 9 (2021)، ص ص. 3183-3200.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1303697
American Medical Association (AMA)
جيلاني، أحمد مصطفى حسن. قابلية النزاع للتحكيم كشرط لصحة اتفاق التحكيم الإلكتروني و التقليدي. المجلة القانونية. 2021. مج. 9، ع. 9، ص ص. 3183-3200.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1303697
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن هوامش.
Record ID
BIM-1303697