العوامل الحجاجية في كتب مجالس العلماء و أماليهم

Abstract EN

Argumentation factors intensify and constrain the argumentation components of a text and link two semantic units within a single vocabulary.

The argumentation factor is based on the appropriate.

If we say that the requirement of vocalization (I almost succeeded) here the response did not get this vocalization requires that and the presence of the factor (almost) clarifies and confirms the work of argumentation, it follows the link between the parts of the text and archives within a single section.

According to the argumentation analysis, (I almost succeeded in moving in the direction that leads the argument (succeeded) and serves one result).

Th e factor has a clear impact on the linguistic argumentation, as its function is to determine the argumentation guidance of the sentence by selecting the appropriate formulas central to the argumentation series.

It directs the vocal to the result by triggering the placements that result in the elimination of the requirements that do not work and the strengthening of the inputs that work to show the result.

Argumentation factors are two types.

The first (Argumentation by the limitation), which is an argumentation mechanism because the tools employ argumentation in the allocation or restriction and remove confusion on the order to allocate it by a means and constrained by a factor (what.

.

.

but - not.

.

.

but - but) that determine the purpose of the speaker and help him persuade the receiver.

The second (argumentation by the negation factor), which is a reaction to the actual proof and process tools can be perceived by recognizing the outcome that the argumentation want to guide the recipient, including (no, not, almost), the presence of these factors informed or not