العلة القاصرة و التعليل بها عند الأصوليين

Abstract EN

The research deals with a fundamental issue which is the restricted reasoning ; the possibility of using it for reasoning; and the dispute between the fundamentalists concerning it.

The research clarified that the disagreement is theoretical, as the Hanafiah scholars took into account the process of measurement, and the majority of scholars took into account the truth of reasoning.

It was found that there is no dispute in not making a measurement without a transitive reason, and there is no objection to explaining the reason for judgment.

The two researchers discussed the reason for the disagreement between the fundamentalists, and showed the benefits of explaining the restricted reasoning.

They showed the methods of the fundamentalists regarding the preference when two reasons conflict: one of them is restricted, and the other transitive.

The research concluded by stating the effect of the difference in reasoning using the restricted reasoning