الإرسال في الروايات الحديثية، المفهوم، الحجة، الأثر : دراسة موضوعية تحليلية

Abstract EN

The transmitted hadith is one of the things on which they differ in terms of arguments among the fundamentalists, jurists and hadith scholars, because it is one of the categories of weak.

some of them said his argument absolutely, and some of them said his rejection absolutely, and some of them said in detail.

this study aimed at trying to reveal a scientific fact that constitutes an ancient and modern disagreement, and the consequent effect on deducing rulings and then achieving the saying in the subject and its weighting according to the significance so that the one who observes or works in the transmitted hadith is aware of its matter.

in editing this topic, the researcher took the inductive-analytical method, and collected what he could from modern books.

and fundamentalism related to the subject, and he studied and analyzed that information and met it on the articles and sections related to the topic.at the end of the research, he showed the results and concluded that the most correct in the matter is to accept the transmitted hadith and invoke it on the condition that the sender is trustworthy and cautious and only sends from trustworthy people so that he is used as evidence.

they differed in the fruit of the disagreement with the sender invoking two sayings : the first : some scholars have argued that the disagreement in this issue is only a disagreement in a phrase that does not result in practical fruit.

the second : that the disagreement in the matter is a real dispute that has implications jurisprudence.