Comparison of different methods in the identification of staphylococcus aureus in cattle

Joint Authors

Muhammad, Abir L.
al-Idani, Ali Abbud

Source

al-Qadisiyah Journal of Veterinary Medicine Sciences

Issue

Vol. 19, Issue 1 (30 Jun. 2020), pp.9-19, 11 p.

Publisher

al-Qadisiyah University College of Veterinary Medicine

Publication Date

2020-06-30

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

11

Main Subjects

Biology

Topics

Abstract EN

This study aimed to compare the efficiency of conventional microbiological, Miniaturizekit GP24 and molecular technique by using PCR of nuc gene in the identification of S.

aureus.

Also to evaluate the efficiency of the tube coagulase and DNase activity tests.

104 of suspected S.

aureus was isolated from different cattle samples, (68.3% ) and (75% ) were positive forcoagulase and DNase tests, respectively.

The sensitivity and specificity of coagulase andDNase were 92.5% , 75.7% and 79.1% , 32.4% respectively.

The identification rate of S.

aureus by GP24 kit and PCR detection using nuc gene was 68.26% and 64.42% respectively.

Out of 104(31.7% ) of isolates were identified as coagulase-negative staphylococci by usingGP24 kit.

Antimicrobials susceptibility assays of 67 S.

aureus isolates revealed that, theThe highest resistance rates were against penicillin (97% ) followed by tetracycline (25.4% ).

While all isolates were found to be highly sensitive toward Imipenem, vancomycin, andchloramphenicol (100% ) for each.

In conclusion, the coagulase and conventionalmicrobiological techniques have more reliable results in comparison with the DNase test forthe identification of S.

aureus.

On other hand, the results of the GP24 kit and coagulase tube testwere similar in sensitivity and This study aimed to compare the efficiency of conventional microbiological, Miniaturizekit GP24 and molecular technique by using PCR of nuc gene in the identification of S.

aureus.

Also to evaluate the efficiency of the tube coagulase and DNase activity tests.

104 of suspected S.

aureus was isolated from different cattle samples, (68.3% ) and (75% ) were positive forcoagulase and DNase tests, respectively.

The sensitivity and specificity of coagulase andDNase were 92.5% , 75.7% and 79.1% , 32.4% respectively.

The identification rate of S.

aureus by GP24 kit and PCR detection using nuc gene was 68.26% and 64.42% respectively.

Out of 104(31.7% ) of isolates were identified as coagulase-negative staphylococci by usingGP24 kit.

Antimicrobials susceptibility assays of 67 S.

aureus isolates revealed that, theThe highest resistance rates were against penicillin (97% ) followed by tetracycline (25.4% ).

While all isolates were found to be highly sensitive toward Imipenem, vancomycin, andchloramphenicol (100% ) for each.

In conclusion, the coagulase and conventionalmicrobiological techniques have more reliable results in comparison with the DNase test forthe identification of S.

aureus.

On other hand, the results of the GP24 kit and coagulase tube testwere similar in sensitivity and specificity.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Muhammad, Abir L.& al-Idani, Ali Abbud. 2020. Comparison of different methods in the identification of staphylococcus aureus in cattle. al-Qadisiyah Journal of Veterinary Medicine Sciences،Vol. 19, no. 1, pp.9-19.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1328200

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Muhammad, Abir L.& al-Idani, Ali Abbud. Comparison of different methods in the identification of staphylococcus aureus in cattle. al-Qadisiyah Journal of Veterinary Medicine Sciences Vol. 19, no. 1 (2020), pp.9-19.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1328200

American Medical Association (AMA)

Muhammad, Abir L.& al-Idani, Ali Abbud. Comparison of different methods in the identification of staphylococcus aureus in cattle. al-Qadisiyah Journal of Veterinary Medicine Sciences. 2020. Vol. 19, no. 1, pp.9-19.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1328200

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1328200