أدوات دفع التعارض الظاهري بين الأدلة الشرعية في مناهج الفقهاء

Abstract EN

This research includes the tools for pushing the apparent contradiction between the legal evidence in the jurists' curricula, by defining the concepts of this study, and clarifying the tools for pushing the apparent contradiction between the legal evidence in the jurists' curricula, and the scholars' approaches to arranging and presenting these tools.

the importance of this study lies in focusing on the tools to push back the apparent contradiction between the legal evidence in the jurists’ curricula, and conducting a comparative study between the jurists’ curricula in presenting and delaying these tools.

the subject itself, and how to arrange and present them when inconsistent.

the reason for choosing this topic is because it is considered one of the topics that the general public in general and the seeker of Islamic knowledge in particular need.

the aim of this study is to clarify the tools to push back the apparent contradiction between the legal evidence in the scholars’ curricula, and to reveal an apparent contradiction that may appear to the researcher, and to clarify the scholars’ methods in arranging and presenting these tools to push back the apparent contradiction between the legal evidence, and to explain the impact of the scholars’ disagreement in the order of using these tools in rulings.

jurisprudence.

in order to answer the problem posed, we have adopted the inductive, deductive and comparative approach, subjecting the position of jurisprudence in order to clarify the tools to push the apparent contradiction between the legal evidence, as well as to clarify the methods of scholars in arranging these tools when there is a conflict between the legal evidence.

the importance of this research appears in the results that we concluded that no matter how different the jurisprudence opinions, but it was keen to push back the conflict between the forensic evidence is limited to three main tools, which are the Aljame of conflicting evidence in Sharia, the Altarjih between the evidence in Sharia, or Alnaskhi, and the scholars' ways of arranging the tools to remove the conflict between the evidence in Sharia affected their differences in many issues.