تنظير البصريين و الكوفيين في تقديم المعمولات على عواملها

Abstract EN

The Title of this Paper has been “ The theorizing of Albasra and AlKufa Grammarians in giving precedence to the (inflection parts) over their causing factors.

” It studies the controversial positions which occurred between those parties with regard to giving precedence to the Inflection part over their factors .

The presentations of Concepts within this Paper have been arranged in three pivot points: The First Pivot point: The theorizing of both groups in giving precedence to the Inflection parts over their caused factors, that is (Kana & Akhawatiha).

The Second Pivot Point: The theorizing of both groups in giving precedence to the Inflection parts over their caused factors, that is: Perfect / complete Verbs.

The Third Pivot Point:” The theorizing of both groups in giving precedence to the Inflection parts over their caused factors, that is: the Participles.

The Paper halted at the Theorizing arguments being applied by each group in order to defend its argue whether to approve the precedence or Disapprove thereof, pointing out the position of the grammarians assembly with respect to both theorizing groups.

The Paper after analyzing such theorizing arguments, concluded that the reason for such multiple variations between the two group have been due to the weakness of the Factors because of its non-inflection or for its branched act such as the name of the verb, or for the availability of an Article (tool) before the Factor that made either of the two group foresee that it should have the prominence.