الحوارية و تعدي مقولة الجنس الأدبي

Abstract EN

This article tries to answer a number of problems such as: dialogic relationship-beieng a conceptual preamble to accommodate the literay discourse and a critical thought that brought a turning point in the history of literary theory by disrupting a set of postulates commonly referred to as- theory of literary genres? .

What does dialogic means? And what do we mean by literary? Does the emergence of discourse as an alternative to the universality of literary genres allow us to predict the preservation of the texts only? .

Are discourses alone capable of developing the essence of literature away from the perception of literary genres? what is the relationship of speech with literary genres? Are there vital interaction between them? Does this proposition mean the eradication of the types of genres and then, an alternative projection that eliminates the dominance of the literary genre? Is the relationship between dialogic and literary genres theory a two-way influence that result in genres transformation and literary development? Does ”Mikhaile bakhtine, s”invocationof what fallunder the literary genres in terms of underpinning formulas neglected by classical poetry allows for the possibility of practicing dialogic activity through an undermined writing procedure in order to produce, in return, a hybrid discourse open to plurality of modes and linguistic multiplicity?