حرية الإقتناع الشخصي للقاضي الجزائي و حدودها في التشريع الجزائري

Abstract EN

There is no doubt that achieving justice is the desired goal of enacting all laws, especially if it comes to committing crimes against the individual and society.

therefore, we find the criminal judge obligated to search for evidence that proves the occurrence of the crime and attributes it to a specific person, which prompted us through this research paper to try to highlight how the criminal judge’s balance between the legally established evidence and his personal conviction until he issues a founding and causal ruling, especially in the absence of a comprehensive law for the texts of the criminal evidence against the terrible development of the crime and the methods of committing it.

evidence he is not convinced of.

in highlighting the importance of the principle of personal conviction of the criminal judge and the extent of its limits, we followed the descriptive-analytical approach to reach a conclusion that the Algerian legislator devoted the principle of personal conviction to the Algerian judge, making the judiciary the greatest role in assuming the task of searching for the truth and issuing reasoned judgments according to the various means of proof.