الانهماك بالتعلم وعلاقته بأساليب معاملة المعلم لدى الطلبة الموهوبين

Abstract EN

The current research seeks to know the level of preoccupation with learning and methods of teacher treatment of gifted students, and in light of the foregoing, the researcher identified the research objectives as follows: identify: 1-the level of preoccupation with learning among gifted students.

2-the differences in the average degrees of engaging in learning according to the gender variable among gifted students.

3-the level of the teacher's treatment of gifted students.

4-the differences in the average scores of the teacher's treatment methods that the student realizes according to the gender variable among gifted students.

5-the relationship between preoccupation with learning and methods of teacher treatment among gifted students.

the basic research sample consisted of (40) male and female students from gifted schools, and the sample was chosen by a stratified random method with an equal distribution of (4) stages, and the logical, apparent and structural validity of the measures was verified, and the stability was extracted by the method of the alpha-Cronbach equation coefficient of internal consistency (for the scale of indulgence).

by learning), and re-testing the teacher’s treatment method scale.

the results of the current research showed the following: 1-after calculating the arithmetic mean of the research sample’s scores on the learning preoccupation scale, it reached (18.11) degrees and with a standard deviation of (10.96) degrees and by comparing it with the hypothetical arithmetic mean (15) degrees, and after calculating the t-value (8.112) a degree with statistical significance in terms of the value ((p) the probability of (000.0) means that gifted students have a preoccupation with learning higher than the hypothetical average.

2-the significance of the difference in the students’ scores on the learning engagement scale according to the gender variable at the level (0.001), as the arithmetic mean of male students was (7.37) and with a standard deviation of (5.37), while the arithmetic mean for females was (7.52), with a standard deviation of (5.32) the calculated t-value was (3,113), which is a function of the probabilistic p-value of (0.000) in favor of females.

3-after calculating the arithmetic mean of the research sample scores on the scale of teacher treatment methods for gifted students, the calculated t value for two groups of methods (democratic-authoritarian) (0.320) is less than the tabular value (1.96), meaning there is no difference between the practitioner with them the democratic method, and the authoritarian method in preoccupation with learning, as for the dimension with methods (excess care-neglect) that the calculated t value for two groups (excess care-neglect) (2.326) is higher than the tabular value (1.96), that is, there is a difference in following the methods of this dimension and it was in favor of excess care 4-the significance of the difference in the grades of gifted students on the teacher’s treatment methods scale according to the gender variable at the level (0.001), and the arithmetic means and standard deviations of the research sample members were extracted in the teacher’s treatment methods, as the results showed that there are no differences between males and females 5-the relationship between engaging in learning and methods of teacher treatment among gifted students.

the correlation was reached using the Pearson correlation coefficient (0.81), which is a function at the level of significance (0.05), where the probability p-value was (0.000).