بين التناص و السرقة الأدبية : مقاربة في نماذج نصية معاصرة

Abstract EN

There must be an affinity, which may be fully identical, or having some genetic similarities, between the father and his son.

Some texts have the status of the father, as Abu Tammam said: “Could the waters of communion be diverse / Our own water is pure and fell from same clouds.

/ Could an origin which may unite us be different / Literature, which we deemed our father, shall unite us.

” However, the similarity between the father and the son does not give anyone descending from the father the legitimacy of taking or stealing from the father without approval.

Even in matters of inheritance, a person would say: “This is my father's legacy” or this is what I inherited from my father.

A son would not inherit his father who is alive, and I say 'alive' because I found out what has been taken by sons from fathers while the latters were alive, and here I mean the 'creative patriarchy.

' More surprisingly, the sons of this father began taking from brothers, without their knowledge or consent.

I liked the statement which says “In his bread, there is much of other people's wheat.

” If taking from the earlier writers is considered influence, though 'taking' literally means 'stealing' if it is done without acknowledging or notifying the source, or referring to the fact that this idea or poetic image is not my own, putting it in quotation marks, along with a citation where the source details of the legitimate father are given.

Hence, this paper has come to return the bread to its legal owners, and do justice to the borrower of the wheat grains rather than to one who obliterates and ignores the ownership of the wheat, enjoying the hot and crispy load which is at hand.

Intertextuality and plagiarism – poetic plagiarisms were very common among early Ar— were among the major and most famous concerns of literature.

This paper is an attempt to disclose some of those who hide behind intertextuality after the attained some acclaim, then a certain theft is exposed.

Thus, the first section of the present paper investigates the roots and origins of intertextuality among Ar, before it is names as such.

The second section is devoted to “Questions of Intertextuality in some literary experiences” whereas the third section focuses on Mahmoud Darwish and the darawish [plural of darwish] who entered his fields of wheat grains.

The researcher shall not have but to attempt and seek success of his attempt, and no research shall end up with results which are final and no further research are left to be found.

.