لغة المصنفين باعتبارها معيارا للتصحيح اللغوي عند اللغويين المحدثين

Abstract EN

The Research aims to clarify language correctness meaning and languages used by authors as the correct standard of proof-reading, and the difference between modern linguists opinion in language criticism standard with example and considering the more probable narration as to authenticity and specifying reasons.

The Research reached the following results: Language critics' opinions divided on this issue into three opinions: the first accepts all language authors, the second refuses all, and the third is impartial that accepts the language of linguists only and refuses who used explanations and footnotes.

The Research considers the more probable opinion as to authenticity between agreed ones and the impartial.

Whereas, claiming of linguists may be carried out, which accepts opinions of the trusted linguists with their knowledge and language and those who used explanations and footnotes, considering that linguists include commentators, jurisprudents, and modernizers, with conditions and regulations explained by the Research.